원문정보
Comparison of Referencing Conventions between English-translated Korean Law Corpus and Non-translated US and British Law Corpora.
초록
영어
The main purpose of this paper is to compare referencing conventions between English-translated Korean laws and non-translated American and British laws in terms of collocational salience and frequencies. Intertexual or referencing devices serve specific functions in the discourse of law, which include signaling textual authority, providing terminological explanation, and facilitating textual mapping. Common law jurisdictions have developed their own preferences in the use of referencing patterns for displaying each function, and established specific contexts of use in their official legislative guidelines. In this respect, English translations of intertextual devices in Korean laws need to reflect the referencing conventions of non-translated laws in order to meet the cognitive expectancy norms of their intended foreign recipients and reduce difficulties with their interpretation at court. The comparison of collocations of main editing units of legislative provisions used in the translated and non-translated law corpora revealed that the translated laws show salient departures from the referencing conventions of TL non-translations for each function, thus requiring revised translation guidelines for ensuring convergence with TL non-translations.
목차
1. 연구의 목적
2. 영미법 상호텍스트장치 관련 정량적 연구의 동향과 필요성
3. 코퍼스 편찬 절차 및 분석 방법
4. 번역·비번역 법령 코퍼스의 상호텍스트장치 사용관습 비교 결과
4.1. 텍스트 근거 표시 기능 상호텍스트장치 사용관습 비교 결과
4.2. 용어 설명 기능 상호텍스트장치 사용관습 비교 결과
4.3. 텍스트맵핑 촉진 기능 상호텍스트장치 사용양상 비교 결과
5. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌
키워드
저자정보
참고문헌
- 1국회법제실 (2016). 법제 이론과 실제. 서울: 국회법제실.
- 2국회법제실 (2019). 법제 이론과 실제(전면 개정판). 서울: 국회법제실.
- 3법제처 (2019). 알기 쉬운 법령 정비 기준(제9판). 세종: 법제처.
- 4유정주 (2022). 한국 법령 상호텍스트장치의 영어 번역에 대한 고찰 - 영미법계 국가들의 최신 법제지침 분석결과를 중심으로. 통번역학연구. 26(1), 75-106.
- 5ACT Parliamentary Counsel’s Office, ACT Government. (2016). Words and phrases guide. Retrieved June 17, 2021, from https://www.pco.act.gov.au/library/Words%20and%20Phrase s.pdf.
- 6Bhatia, V. K. (1982). An investigation into formal and functional characteristics of qualifications in legislative writing and its application to English for academic legal purposes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Aston in Birmingham.
- 7Bhatia, V. K. (1987). Textual-mapping in British legislative writing. Word Englishes, 6(1), 1-10.
- 8Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
- 9Bhatia, V. K. (1994). Cognitive structuring in legislative provisions. In J. Gibbons (Ed.), Language and the law (pp. 136-155). Harlow, Essex, England; New York: Longman.
- 10Bhatia, V. K. (1998). Intertextuality in legal discourse. The Language Teacher, 22(11), 13-18.