earticle

논문검색

Associations Between L2 Proficiency and Efficacy of Corrective Feedback Types

원문정보

Yusuke Sato

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

This study examined the relative effectiveness of recasts, explicit correction, and metalinguistic prompts on developing English past progressive forms among second language (L2) learners, and whether the effectiveness of each feedback type was differently associated with L2 proficiency. A total of 197 Japanese learners of English as a foreign language were divided into recast, explicit correction, metalinguistic prompt, task-only, and test control groups. The first three groups performed tasks and received corrective feedback (CF). The task-only group performed the same tasks as the CF groups but did not receive CF. The test control group did not perform the tasks and solely took pretests and posttests. The results showed that explicit types of feedback (explicit correction and metalinguistic prompts) were more effective than implicit feedback (recasts). Further, simple regression analyses showed that L2 proficiency was significantly associated with gains in scores of the recast and metalinguistic prompt groups but not the explicit correction group. These results suggest that L2 proficiency differentially influences the effectiveness of different CF types.

목차

Abstract
Introduction
Theoretical Issues
CF Types
CF and L2 Proficiency
The Present Study
Methods
Participants
Target Structure
Treatment
CF
Learning Outcome Measures
L2 Proficiency
Procedure
Analysis
Results
UGJT
EIT
Discussion
Relative Effectiveness of the Different Types of CF on Developing of the Past Progressive Form
Effects of L2 Proficiency
Conclusion
The Author
References

저자정보

  • Yusuke Sato Nagano University, Japan

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 4,600원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.