earticle

논문검색

硏究論文

기간제법 시행 이후 갱신기대권 법리에 관한 소고

원문정보

A study on the legal principle of renewal expectation rights after enforcement of the Fixed-term Employee Act

노길준, 이승길

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

(1) The renewal expectation right in the Short-term Employee Act was the legal principle established to prevent the employer’s abuse of using fixed-term employment and to protect employees in the repeatedly renewed employment contract. Even though it has been ten years since the Fixed-term Employee Act was implemented, it is a still controversy between the labor and management over whether the principle of renewal expectation rights could be used or not. Since there were some court rulings about renewal expectation rights in the regional and high courts, but there has been no Supreme Court ruling until recently. Even in the regional and high courts, such renewal expectation rights were not recognized continuously. The Supreme Court ruled on the case of “Working-Together Foundation” and recognized the renewal expectation right at the newly established short-term employment contract. This Supreme Court ruling could suggest a court ruling guide over whether the legal principle of renewal expectation right could be recognized or not. (2) After the Fixed-term Employee Act was implemented, whether the legal principle of renewal expectation rights could be recognized depends on whether in Article 4 of the Fixed-term Employee Act, the purpose of its enactment for restricting fixed-term employment could be interpreted narrowly as one to ‘prevent the abuse of using fixed-term employment contracts or widely as one to extend flexibility in employment. Also, there has been no such a Supreme Court ruling about the recognized case of renewal expectation rights so far. Now, we have some rulings in the regional and high courts as well as the Supreme Court about renewal expectation rights. In terms of reviewing the purpose of the Fixed-term Employee Act about the restriction of fixed-term employments, which was to prevent the abuse of repeating fixed-term employments and to guarantee the employee’s status, the Short-term Employee Act could not be used to prevent a justifiable expectation of automatic renewal, but also to extinguish expectation renewal rights already established and granted. After all, as the legal principle of renewal expectation rights has several limitations, Article 4 of the Fixed-term Employee Act should be supplemented with more legislative revisions.

목차

Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
 Ⅱ. 기간제법 이전의 갱신기대권의 적용
 Ⅲ. 기간제법 시행 이후 갱신기대권의 적용
 Ⅳ. 갱신기대권 인정 여부에 관한 검토
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

저자정보

  • 노길준 Noh Kiljoon. 아주대학교 일반대학원, 박사과정 수료.
  • 이승길 Lee Seung-Gil. 아주대학교 법학전문대학원, 교수.

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 8,700원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.