earticle

논문검색

How Conservative Should School Grammar Be?

원문정보

Kang, Seung-Man

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Since the advent of structural and generative linguistics in the 20th century, traditional school grammar has been attacked as being inadequate, illegitimate, and useless (Haussamen, 2000). Nevertheless, this traditional grammar has remained the basis for grammar instruction worldwide and is still being used as the primary method of English grammar instruction in Korea’s EFL classrooms. Recently, there have been hot debates on the integration of generative linguistics as a supplementary resource for grammar instruction (Bae, 2003; Kolln & Hancock, 2005; Park, 2009). This paper examines the perceptual pattern of SVOC constructions, an equivalent to the 5th predicate form in Onions (1932, 1971), through the survey among college students. The findings of the survey reveal that the analysis of those constructions within the traditional school grammar runs counter to the subjects’ perceptual pattern of them. Rather, it conforms to the analysis within the generative linguistic paradigm. I accordingly suggest the integration of some important concepts of generative linguistics within the main syllabus of traditional school grammar

목차

I. Introduction
 II. The Basis of School Grammar
  1. Five Predicate Forms (Onions, 1932; 1971)
  2. Immediate Problems in SVOCs
 III. SVOCs in Generative Linguistics
  1. Subject and Small Clause
  2. Predication
  3. Theta-Role, PRO, and Subcategorization
  4. Case
 IV. Method
  1. Subjects
  2. Materials and Procedures
  3. Results and Discussion
 V. Conclusion
 Works Cited
 Abstract

저자정보

  • Kang, Seung-Man 강승만. Chungbuk National University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,200원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.