earticle

영어

The purpose of this study is to create job training classification related to other classification including job classification, qualification classification, and etc. The job training classification developed in the study is applied to a mapping table associated with the job classification and qualification classification. By performing this study, policy directors of the labor market and suppliers and consumers of the labor market can learn integrated information of the labor market. It is, therefore, anticipated that the policy makers of the labor market will efficiently carry out policies and the difference between labor demand and supply will be decreased. "Is it necessary to classify the job training?" initiated the study. It is asked if the Korean job training classification is differentiated from the job classification and qualification classification. The result of the study shows that the job training comprises a training program(curricular subjects), training facility, trainees, trainers and etc. The result also indicates that the job training is not only different from the job classification based on job specifications but also the job qualification including qualification subjects. Analyzing the procedures of prior studies revealed that the studies on the job classification and job training classification have not been legislated nor amended by scientific and organized methods. The employment classification of occupations(Korea Labor Institute, 2000), cited frequently in the matter of the legislation of Korea employment classification of occupations, deals only with the result of a study without mentioning the procedure of the study that is briefly seen in the introduction. The employment classification of occupations does not seem to be scientifically validated because it does not explain the reason and procedure of the amendment but only the result that was amended by specialists in the course of the amendment. The training classification indicates that the examples of training types are based on 'handbook of job guide: training information(Ministry of Labor, central employment information management agency)'. However, the development procedure and method are not found in the handbook. The job training classification in this study was developed based on classification theories. Classification standard, classification system, and classification name were applied to the job training classification. Although existing classifications clearly states the classification system(major group - minor group - unit group), they doesn't specify the job training classification standard and classification name. The criteria of the job training classification is up to training subjects. The training subjects were classified into a major, minor, and unit group. Similar courses were integrated so that terminologies such as standard training course names and approximate(comparable) training course names can be adopted. The job training classification is differentiated in that it is developed considering the relations with the job classification and qualification classification. In order to find a method that associates a job skill level and job type with the job training classification, existing training courses were investigated. As a result, it was found that there were few training courses reflecting the job skill levels in the market of existing job training. Therefore, the job type is important in the job training classification. The job type was classified into major, minor, and unit group and the job skill level was classified into high, mid, and ordinary level. It is convenient to relate the job type to the unit group in the National technical qualification framework which is categorized into professional engineers, engineers, industrial engineers, and craftsmen. Understanding of the correlation analysis of training and qualification, collection of information of training subjects, and actual condition of the training classification was original in the study compared to the former studies. Having designed the job training classification, the minor group playing a key role in relation structure was matched with the unit group of the job classification. It is because, as confirmed in the prior studies, matching three categories of the job classification with the minor group of the job training classification can lead to conformance as well as the deterioration of practicality. Therefore, in the study, the principles of the job training classification for the categorization of the Korean job training were determined and the training subjects were established as the classification standard according to the principles of the job training classification. By suggesting this new method for the Korea job training classification, the result of this study will be found very helpful to the systemization of the legislation and amendment, contents, methods, and procedures in the job related classification.

한국어

본 연구의 목적은 직업분류, 자격분류 등 관련분류와 연계가 가능한 직업훈련분류를 만드는 것이다. 이를 통해 노동시장 정책관리자, 노동시장 공급자 및 수요자 측면에서 통합된 노동시장 정보의 습득이 가능토록 하여 노동시장정책의 효율적인 수행을 지원하고 인력수급의 불일치 등을 감소시키는 효과를 기대할 수 있다. 본 연구는 분류이론에 입각하여 직업훈련분류를 개발하였다. 분류의 3요소인 분류기준, 분류체계, 분류명칭을 직업훈련분류에 적용하였다. 기존 분류는 분류체계(대분류-중분류-예시직종 등)는 명시하고 있지만 직업훈련분류기준과 분류명칭에 대한 언급은 없다. 본 연구에서는 직업훈련분류의 기준을 훈련교과목으로 하고 훈련교과목에 따라 대분류-중분류-소분류의 분류체계로 편성을 하였고, 표준훈련과정명과 유사훈련과정명이라는 개념을 도입하여 교과목이 유사한 것은 통합하여 혼돈을 피하였다. 또한 직업분류, 자격분류와 같은 관련분류와의 연계를 감안한 직업훈련분류를 개발하였다는 점에서 차별성이 있다. 직업능력수준과 직무유형을 직업훈련분류에 적용하는 방법을 찾기 위해 기존 진행된 훈련과정을 조사한 결과 현재의 직업훈련시장에서 직업능력수준을 반영하여 형성된 훈련과정이 적었다. 따라서 직업훈련분류에서 주된 것은 직무유형이다. 직무유형은 훈련교과목을 기준으로 대분류-중분류-소분류체계로 구분하고 직능수준은 세 분류에 고급, 중급, 일반으로 구분하여 반영하였다. 이를 통해 국가기술자격체계의 소분류가 기술사, 기사, 산업기사, 기능사 등으로 구분되어 있는 것과 연계를 용이하게 하였다. 아울어 훈련과 자격의 연관관계 분석, 훈련교과목 정보의 수집, 훈련분류의 실태 등을 파악한 점은 기존의 연구에서는 없는 새로운 시도였다. 그리고 직업훈련분류 설계 시 연계체계의 중심인 중분류와 직업분류의 소분류를 매치시켰다. 선행연구에서도 확인할 수 있는 바와 같이, 직업분류의 세 분류와 소분류를 매치시킬 경우 정합성이 우려되고 실용성이 저하되었기 때문이다.