earticle

영어

Reconsideration of criticism in the 1950s - Focusing on Chul-Bum Lee’s early criticism - Kim, Hyun-ju Reality of before and after, was a society that was stagnant in that it is a space in which order all existing is collapse. Literary also visible efforts to establish a new philosophy of literature in its own way reality was battered around, but the logic of them to win legitimacy and was wanting. Taking advantage of the political ideology, and advocates consistent conservative nationalism, not writers and young was by Western literary various theories, and from the perspective of efforts, and or willing to testify era from them it was a very you should take a look at trace. Such recognition is, the study of writers who in the process is separated into break machine in the 1950s, to become hard and more and more, to plan advancement of reality at the time, the ethnic literature further, tried to stick to the original route of its own way it is a reality to have been marginalized further. These studies, is restored little by little recently, the reason for the individual and their problem to be solved still trapped in the flow to reveal the private continuity of ethnic literature theory was in full swing in the 1970s this it is allowed to remain as left. It is a situation that has not received a fair evaluation still Chul-Bum Lee also also corresponding to the conflict and write real time to close about ‘30 on stage later without resting phase of once in one of them. Issues in cultural and poor social situation of the reality of post-war, should be acquired on a priority basis as literati Korea to stick to what Chul-Bum Lee’s criticism. In other words, we are trying to diagnose the reality in the historical context, active participation to the reality that is presented as a solution to this, is resulting in it naturally does not have to have a title loss of ethnic literature theory also does not dare I show that the aspect. In the process of stress the need for resistance and criticized the improper time, do not mean there is no tendency to be excessively emphasized in cross-section of axiomatic ethical and stiff little his logic, but the point of view of current this not a foundation from, if stock out at the current sense of the contemporary, you can get a glimpse of a new cross-section of the thinking of his unique that has not been revealed until now.