원문정보
Self-defense due to Mistake and Phase of Liability
초록
영어
Even though someone has intent for defense and act in self-defense, if the objective circumstances don’t meet the objective precondition of justification for criminal law §21 , it is regarded as illegal act, and this is“mistaken Self-defense.” It is similar to‘mistake of fact’, not because of the intent covering the evaluation of law, but the intent of fact. It is also similar to‘mistake of law’which cannot be aware of their own illegality in conclusion because their acts meet constituent elements, but it is not illegal. However, the preventive act due to this mistake is the independent type of intent which cannot correspond with any other mistake. Without any punishment regulations, it is being solved according to the theory of mistake of precondition in the circumstances of precluding liability at present. Underneath the surface of the conflict between the resolution of the mistake of precondition in the circumstances of precluding liability and the related theories, there are problems of the object of intent as the subjective element of justification, the systematic status, theory of criminal system, and the establishment of complicity. Especially on the systematic status of intent, conflicting strict liability and legal effect-limited liability are connected to liability intent. This article covers the definition of‘liability intent’from the perspective of the conflict between related theories and cognitive psychology. It reviews also the phase of mens rea focusing on the definition of‘recklessness’of common law to examine the possibility of phase of intent, and discusses the applicability to criminal law.
한국어
행위자가 방위의사를 가지고 정당방위 행위를 실행하였으나 객관적 사정이 형법 제21조의 정당방위를 위한 위법성조각사유의 객관적 전제요건을 충족하지 못하여 실재로는 불법행위로 평가되는 것이 오상방 위행위이다. 이러한 착오에 의한 방위행위는 그 어느 착오와도 일치된다고 할 수 없는 독자적 유형의 착 오형태로, 현재 그 행위에 대한 처벌규정이 없이 위법성조각사유의 전제사실에 관한 착오이론에 따라 해 결하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 관련한 학설의 대립과 인지심리학적 관점에서의“책임고의 개념”에 대해 살펴보고, 고의의 단계화 가능성 검토를 위하여 영미법상“무모함(recklessness)”개념을 중심으로 범의(mens rea) 단계화를 검토하여 형법에서의 적용 가능성을 살펴본다.
목차
Ⅰ. 오상방위의 착오와 책임고의의 문제
Ⅱ. 형법상 책임고의
Ⅲ. 책임고의 단계화 구상을 위한 영미법상 “recklessness” 이해
Ⅳ. 책임고의의 단계화 시론
참고문헌
Abstract