원문정보
초록
영어
This paper aims to introduce an overview of the regime of expert witness in the medical malpractice litigation, and to provide a plan of how to make it improved. In regard with medical expert witness, several problems, such as time-consuming procedure, non-neural and unclear opinion without reasons provided, have been pointed out for several years. Lack of skill of the court and plaintiff/defender to question the expert is one of many cause to lead to the above problems. What is questioned to the expert? Because expert witness is used in determining probability of negligence, questions to the expert should be selected on the grounds of whether or not to obtain opinions or facts sufficient to let the judge infer negligence in view of the theory of proof burden established by the Supreme Court. In addition, to avoid non-neutral and unclear opinion, it is necessary to question the expert clearly, specifically and scientifically
목차
II. 제도의 일반론
1. 감정 및 감정촉탁제도
2. 사실조회
III. 의료감정의 문제점
1. 회신의 장기화
2. 편파적 감정의 문제
3. 감정의 불명확성 및 부정확성
IV. 진료기록감정사항의 작성과 감정결과의 해석
1. 진료기록감정사항 작성
2. 부적절한 질문 예
3. 감정결과의 해석
V. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT