earticle

영어

The selection test items for secondary Japanese teachers from school year 2004- school year 2008(first), and selection test items for Japanese language school year of 2009(second) as well as school year 2009- school year 2010 tries to arrange an analysis investigation about making question tendency. To sum it up for review the analysis are as follows: First, if you try to investigate the analysis according to the standard tendency of questions in the school year 2004- school year 2008 (first) Selection test items for secondary Japanese teachers does not match with the agreement ratio average of 56.5%. Second, At the school year 2009 as well as school year of 2010 about the selection test items for secondary Japanese teachers about the tendency of questions. The selection test items for secondary Japanese teachers tentative standard does not match with the ratio average of 80.5% if you try to investigate the agreement of making questions by the evaluation area. Third, from the standard of school year 2009(second) the selection test items for secondary Japanese teachers, the contents of the curriculum learning belongs to the Japanese language surveying study and the assessment presented is independent. So the question being made was change to「An introduction to Japanese literature and Culture｣. Instead of Japanese language surveying study. And this can be able to confirm. From above problem point about the「Selection test items for secondary Japanese teachers｣reconsideration and discussion will be necessary.

일본어

「2004-2008學年度日本語科任用試驗(1次)｣と「2009-2010學年度日本語科任用試驗(1次)｣及び「2009學年度日本語科任用試驗(2次)｣の出題傾向に対する分析․檢討を整理してみると次の通りである。 第一に、「2004-2008學年度日本語科任用試驗(1次)｣の出題傾向を「任用試驗基準(1次)｣に従って分析․檢討してみると、評價領域別出題比率の平均的な一致度が56.6%に過ぎないことがわかる。 第二に、「2009-2010學年度日本語科任用試驗(1次)｣に対する出題傾向を「任用試驗基準(1次)｣に従って分析․檢討してみると、評價領域別出題比率の平均的な一致度が80.5%に過ぎないことがわかる。第三に、「2009學年度日本語科任用試驗(2次)｣の基準では「敎科內容學｣に屬する「日本語學槪論｣を獨立的な評價領域として出題するように提示しているが、「日本語學槪論｣の代わりに「日本文學槪論+日本文化｣を出題していることが確認できる。以上、考察してきたように「日本語科任用試驗｣の問題點に対する論議と再考が必要であるように思われる。