원문정보
초록
영어
This paper analyzes the typology of assimilation (voicing assimilation and place assimilation), focusing on the 'grandfather effect' (McCarthy 2002, 2003a) observed in the case where the assimilation to marked structures is not allowed but the assimilation to unmarked structures is allowed. It recognizes that Hall (2007) accurately points out a flaw in McCarthy (2002, 2003a) where the typological difference in assimilation cannot be explained. This paper, however, shows that contrary to Hall's argument, the flaw has not been caused by the separation of markedness constraints, and proposes that IDENT(F) in McCarthy's analysis should be replaced with MAX(F) constraints. This proposal means that IDENT(voice) should be replaced with MAX(voice) in voicing assimilation and IDENT(place) should be replaced with the universally fixed constraint ranking MAX(dors), MAX(__cor) » MAX(lab) » MAX(cor), MAX(__lab|dors), which originates from Jun (1995), to retain the separation of markedness constraints. Further, this paper shows that the separation strategy of IDENT(F) also accounts for the grandfather effect cases in assimilation.
목차
1. 서론
2. 유․무성성 동화와 MAX(voice)
2.1. NNoVcdOb/ONoVcdOb 대 MAX(voice)/DEP(voice)
2.2. Hall (2007)에 대한 대안: McCarthy (2002, 2003a) 분석의 수정
3. 조음위치 동화와 유표성 제약 분할의 유효성
3.1. 조음위치 동화의 다양한 패턴들
3.2. 일반적 동화 패턴들: Jun (1995)의 제안에 기초한 분석
3.3. SLPC의 조부 효과 패턴 분석: 유표성 제약의 분할
3.4. 충실성 제약의 분할에 의거한 분석
4. 결론
참고문헌