earticle

논문검색

【번역】

法官的審判思維與特徵

원문정보

A Study on Justice Thinking and A Study on Justice Thinking and

법관적심판사유여특징

王申

한중법학회 중국법연구 제9집 2008.06 pp.299-319
피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

In essence, the thinking is a spiritual practice. As the results and products of the spiritual practice, the thinking includes the theory, the doctrine and the ideology. The legal thinking with general legal profession related, as a concept in modern legal science, are some manners or habits which originated from legal profession’s observation, thinking, analysis and judgement on legal issues in the long-term legal practice. In judicial practice, all of magistrates are the direct results of judge thinking, or judge thinking play an important role in the results of legal issues. Judge thinking include two legal way: “According to the law on” and “Thoughts on law”. The purpose of justice is to make rules of law applicable to the activities of specific casesby judge, which is decided by the thinking what to seek “Anything worth understanding”. But the results of magistrates are decided by “former see” of judge which set the quality of judge thinking.
In other words, what is the “former see” what kind of thinking has breadth and depth. Judge thinking belong to judicial philosophy.

중국어

從本質上說,思維是人的一種精神實踐活動;作為這種精神實踐活動的結果和產物,是理論、學說 和思想體系。法律思維作為現代法律科學中的一個概念,與一般的法律職業相關,它是法律職業者在長期法律
實踐中所形成的觀察、思考、分析和判斷法律問題的方式或習慣。在司法實踐中,法官所作的任何裁判都是其思維活動直接作用的結果,或者說,法官的思維對案件的處理結果起著十分重要的作用。法官思維包括“根據法律的思考”和“關於法律的思考”兩種法律方式。司法審判目的是法官將法律規則適用於具體案件的活動中,尋找“什麼東西值得認識”的思維所規定的。然而,司法審判是受法官已經獲得的“前見”所決定,這些“前見”規定著法官思維的品質,可以說有什麼樣的“前見”就有什麼樣的思維廣度和深度。法官思維特徵屬於司法理念的一部分。

목차

一. 序论
 二. 思維的起源底定義與特徵
 三. 法律思維與法官思維
  (一) 關於法律思維
  (二) 關於法官的思維
 四. 底法官審判思維的基本特徵
  (1) 壟斷司法裁判權思維
  (2) 嚴守司法程式性思維
  (3) 法律規則至上論思維
 五. 结论
 参考文献
 Abstract

저자정보

  • 王申 왕신. 华东政法大学,教授

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,700원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.