earticle

영어

According to the WTO Secretariat report, during the period 1 January 1995-30 June 2007, China was the most frequent target of new anti-dumping investigations, and products exported from China were the most frequent target of new anti-dumping measures. Korea was the second
most frequently targeted country in this respect. Also, Korea and China initiated numerous anti-dumping investigations and applied anti-dumping measures vis-àà-vis each other. So, it seems very important to learn about the anti-dumping legal system of China and Korea through comparative study.
In this article, I compared the Chinese and Korean anti-dumping system with WTO rules, and analyzed it with particular reference to law of both countries. As a result of this study, I concluded that several part of the Chinese and Korean anti-dumping legal system are not consistent with WTO rules. There are also some aspects that the Chinese and Korean
government should learn from each other, such as a lesser duty rule, anti-circumvention, public interest and so on.

중국어

据世贸组织秘书处的报告，从1995年1月1日起到2007年6月30日，针对中国的反倾销调查数量最多，中国也是受到反倾销措施最多的成员。而我们的邻国韩国也受到较多的反倾销调查，成为第二大反倾销受调查成员。此外，中韩两国间又互相展开了很多反倾销调查，并最终征收反倾销税。因此，对中韩两国的反倾销法律制度进行比较研究非常有意义。在本文中，作者首先将中韩两国的反倾销制度同世贸组织规则进行了比较分析。发现两国的反倾销制度中都存在一些与世贸组织规则不一致的内容，并且也发现两国政府可就从轻征税规则、防止规避、公共利益等诸多内容进行互相学习和合作。