초록
영어
This paper examines fragment constructions mainly focusing on their scope phenomena. The comparison of fragment answers and full clause answers shows that there are both differences and similarities in their scope patterns. Unlike Ahn & Cho (2005) who argue for the systematic scope differences between fragment and full clause answers, I will show that there are few differences between fragment and full clause answers in QP-QP scope interactions while there are clear differences between them in neg-QP scope interactions These differences, I argue, follow from the prevalent assumptions about movement, phase, and negation scope. (Hannam University)
목차
Abstract
I. Introduction
II. Previous Analysis - Ahn & Cho (2005)
III. A Critical review on Ahn & Cho (2005)
3.1. movement and P edge
3.2. negative question puzzles
3.3. scope of scrambled QPs
3.4. neg-QP scope vs. QP-QP scope
3.5. question types and scope change
IV. Movement, scope, and reconstruction
4.1. scope asymmetry in subject and object fragments
4.2. Negative question puzzles
4.3. scope differences between QP-QP and neg-QP
4.4. question types and scope change
V. Conclusion
Works Cited
I. Introduction
II. Previous Analysis - Ahn & Cho (2005)
III. A Critical review on Ahn & Cho (2005)
3.1. movement and P edge
3.2. negative question puzzles
3.3. scope of scrambled QPs
3.4. neg-QP scope vs. QP-QP scope
3.5. question types and scope change
IV. Movement, scope, and reconstruction
4.1. scope asymmetry in subject and object fragments
4.2. Negative question puzzles
4.3. scope differences between QP-QP and neg-QP
4.4. question types and scope change
V. Conclusion
Works Cited
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보