earticle

논문검색

칼라일과 에머슨의 영웅관 비교

원문정보

“A Comparative Study of the View of Hero between Carlyle and Emerson.”

박진원

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

The historical sequence of On Heroes traces a progressive skepticism that threatens the possibility of a unifying belief.
Carlyle's own modern awareness of the historical relativity of all ideas forces him to replace
his demand for belief with a demand for order. In the book On Heroes, Carlyle stresses the
necessity of an authoritarian governor. Carlyle fears that modern printing technology, by
offering a diversity of ideas to the public market, will only increase social disorder.Emerson's
Representative Men, on a contrary concept, offers an individualist response to Carlyle's doctrine
of hero-worship. The proper uses of great men, Emerson insists, are as symbols of the cultural
resources available to individuals, and as inspiring examples of individuals who used those
resources to do their own work. Goethe, the culminating figure in Representative Men,
exemplifies this individualist attitude toward culture. (Pusan National University)

목차

Abstract
 I. 서론
 II. 칼라일의 입장
  2.1 영웅의 필요성
  2.2 현대성과 영웅의 실패
 III. 에머슨의 입장
  3.1 회의(懷疑)의 순기능
  3.2 대표적 인물의 효용
 IV. 결론
 인용문헌

저자정보

  • 박진원 Park, Jin-won.. 부산대학교

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.