earticle

영어

Purpose: We were to identify the differences of “Job stress” and “Depression scores” in the
divided groups by self-efficacy. And the factors affecting Depression scores were analyzed.
Method: This study was conducted from July 2006 to September 2006. Collected 295 surveys
were used in this study among 311 surveys since 16 surveys offered insufficient data.
SPSS for Windows 10.0 was used to analyse the data. Result: We identified the factors of
“Occupational climate”, “Job control”, “Job demand” as affecting the depression scores in
the lower self-efficacy group by the multivariables statistical analysis. And this statistical model had 12.5% explainable power.
Also, the factors of “Occupational climate” were identified as affecting the depression scores in
the higher self-efficacy group. And the statistical model had 9.0% explainable power.
Conclusion: In the lower self-efficacy group, the scores of the job stress and depression were significantly higher. Therefore, in the lower self-efficacy group, the self-efficacy promotion programs should be needed for prevention of the related occupational diseases.
The factors related job stress were identified as affecting the depression scores in both lower
and higher self-efficacy groups. Therefore, job stress management program should be prepared
for stress loading workers.