earticle

영어

The terminology 'Kamikaze·Suicide Drone' has been widely used in media, academia, and even military documents to describe unmanned strike systems. However, this study demonstrates that such terminology is problematic because it introduces historical, political, and ethical connotations that distort the doctrinal and technical nature of these systems. By analyzing doctrinal references from NATO and the U.S. Army, the study highlights the inconsistencies that arise in doctrinal interpretation, procurement classification, training, and coalition interoperability when misleading terms are employed. As an alternative, the research proposes the adoption of standardized terminology, using 'Strike Drone' as a general category and distinguishing Loitering Munitions(LM) and One-Way Attack(OWA) Drones as doctrinally distinct subcategories. The findings underscore that establishing accurate terminology is not merely a semantic exercise but an essential requirement for doctrinal development, procurement efficiency, and operational interoperability in the era of drone warfare. This study contributes to ongoing debates on military terminology and provides a foundation for clearer doctrinal development and policy formulation in future drone warfare.