earticle

영어

This study explores the critical interrelationship between component standardization and airworthiness certification in the context of military aircraft systems. As the complexity and technological integration of modern defense platforms increase, the alignment between standardized component frameworks and evolving airworthiness requirements becomes essential to ensure operational reliability, safety, and maintainability. The current defense acquisition and certification systems often operate in a decoupled manner, leading to duplicated testing, certification delays, and cost overruns. Through comparative analysis of national and international certification protocols (MIL-HDBK-516, NATO STANAG, EASA SIB), this paper identifies structural inefficiencies in managing non-standardized or partially certified components. Based on these findings, the study proposes a function-based integrated management system that enables data synchronization across standard parts databases, quality records, and certification requirements. The proposed framework consists of four core modules: (1) standard part information management, (2) quality assurance and test linkage, (3) certification support engine, and (4) lifecycle risk monitoring. The study also anticipates quantifiable improvements such as reduced certification time and improved audit traceability. The results provide practical and policy implications for enhancing the interoperability, reliability, and export competitiveness of domestic defense platforms.