earticle

영어

The regular building inspection system, introduced with the Building Management Act in 2020, has improved safety but also exposed limitations such as high costs, administrative inefficiency, and low acceptance due to uniform inspection intervals. This study proposes differentiated scheduling to address these issues. Research methods included legislative and international case analysis, examination of 42,773 inspection records in the Building Lifecycle Management System (BLCM), surveys of building managers, civil complaint analysis, and interviews with local officials. Findings show that while the system contributes to safety, it faces structural challenges including excessive costs, low satisfaction, and overlap with other regulations. Accordingly, the study suggests an integrated grading system, extending inspection intervals from three to six years for A–B grade buildings, mandatory self-inspections during extended cycles, and emergency inspections for high-risk buildings. Remaining tasks include cost estimation standards, coordination with other legal systems, empirical validation of grading, and refinement of administrative procedures.In conclusion, differentiated scheduling should be seen not as simple rescheduling but as a new paradigm of building maintenance anchored in risk-based management, digital governance, public–private collaboration, and incentive structures—that strengthens effectiveness and advances a mature building maintenance culture.