초록
영어
The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate that the underlying structure of English wh&wh constructions is a mono-clausal one. Previous analyses of wh&wh constructions, such as the elliptical analysis of Giannakidou and Merchant(1998) and the multiple dominance conceptualization of Citko and Gracanin-Yuksek(2013), Citko(2013), and Gracanin Yuksek(2007) posit a bi-clausal structure as an underlying structure. However, the bi-clausal analyses are untenable due to empirical problems. This paper shows that Chomsky’s(2023) Box System can explain the formation processes of wh&wh constructions. Further, an argumental wh-adjunct where is optionally boxed, and a boxed wh-phrase is subject to the movement timing constraint.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Previous Approaches of wh&wh constructions
2.1. Giannakidou and Merchant (1998): Elliptical Analysis
2.2. Multiple Dominance (MD) Analysis
3. An alternative: Chomsky’s (2023) Box System (BS)
3.1. Derivation Processes of wh&wh construction with OTVs, and Constraint
3.2. Derivation Processes of wh&wh construction with Two non-argumental wh-adjuncts
3.3. Well-formedness and Ill-formedness of wh&wh construction with Three Arguments-taking Transitive verb put
3.4. Ill-formedness of wh&wh constructions in DC and DOC
4. Conclusion
References
1. Introduction
2. Previous Approaches of wh&wh constructions
2.1. Giannakidou and Merchant (1998): Elliptical Analysis
2.2. Multiple Dominance (MD) Analysis
3. An alternative: Chomsky’s (2023) Box System (BS)
3.1. Derivation Processes of wh&wh construction with OTVs, and Constraint
3.2. Derivation Processes of wh&wh construction with Two non-argumental wh-adjuncts
3.3. Well-formedness and Ill-formedness of wh&wh construction with Three Arguments-taking Transitive verb put
3.4. Ill-formedness of wh&wh constructions in DC and DOC
4. Conclusion
References
키워드
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보