earticle

영어

This study analyzes and compares performance management systems and indicators of rural tourism projects across Korean central government ministries, focusing on MAFRA. Using the IPOO framework, the research examines tourism-related projects from the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, Ministry of the Interior and Safety, and Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries. The main findings reveal three key points. First, performance indicators must be systematically designed from the initial stages, considering both quantitative and qualitative aspects, based on the program logic model. Second, comprehensive performance management requires periodic monitoring and appropriate indicator systems, though most analyzed projects lack these elements. Third, given recent policy changes emphasizing regional autonomy, performance indicators should reflect local visions and strategies, with core indicators established for comparative evaluation. While ministries showed similarities in project scale and content, their performance management systems varied considerably. Quantitative indicators were most prevalent in the output phase (37.5%), while qualitative indicators were highest in the input phase (35%), suggesting different emphases in performance measurement. This study advances understanding of cross-ministerial differences in performance management systems. However, it is limited by not examining actual evaluation results. Future research should analyze feedback systems and practical applications.