원문정보
Perception Differences Among Expert Groups on Urban Regeneration Projects Applying of Budget Allocation : A Case Study of Chungcheongnam-do
초록
영어
This study investigates the perception differences among expert groups regarding urban regeneration projects, specifically through the application of budget allocation methods. Focusing on the Urban Regeneration New Deal Projects in Chungcheongnam-do, the research analyzes how stakeholders, including the research group, public sector, private companies, and semi-public organizations, prioritize different project elements under budget constraints. The study finds that public experts emphasize long-term sustainability and social benefits, while private entities prioritize physical environments. Semi-public organizations strike a balance but vary depending on the specific project context. The case studies of Chungcheongnam-do's projects reveal how these differing priorities affect decisionmaking processes and the overall success of urban regeneration efforts. The findings underscore the challenges in aligning diverse stakeholder interests and highlight the need for comprehensive planning that integrates physical infrastructure, economic revitalization, and community engagement.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
1. 연구의 배경 및 목적
2. 연구의 범위 및 방법
Ⅱ. 이론 및 선행연구 고찰
Ⅲ. 분석 방법론과 자료 조사
1. 예산할당법
2. 전문가 설문조사 개요
3. 도시재생사업 관련 집단 간 차이 분석 방법론
Ⅳ. 예산할당법 설문조사 분석 결과
1. 전문가 집단별 기초 통계량
2. 계획요소의 전문가 집단별 사업비 배분 차이 검정 결과
3. 세부사업의 전문가 집단별 사업비 배분 차이 검정 결과
Ⅴ. 결론
정책적 시사점
참고문헌