earticle

영어

In order to simplify and reduce the cost of the analysis process for reference samples, STR typing using direct PCR buffer was confirmed. To select an efficient buffer, STR typing was performed using two kinds of buffers. As a result of comparing the STR full profile detection rate and peak height through the heat treatment-based rapid extraction method of the reference samples, it was confirmed that STR GO! was more efficient than Prep-n-Go. In addition, when using commercially available STR and Y-STR analysis kits (GlobalFiler, PowerPlex Fusion, Y23), it was found that there was no problem in result analysis even if the PCR reaction volume for DNA extracted with STR GO! was reduced to 10 uL. However, the detection rate of STR profiles decreased in DNA that had passed time after extraction. To overcome this, the dilution ratio of the PCR amplification product was adjusted and it was confirmed that there was no problem with STR typing even 4 weeks after extraction. This study is expected to be of great help in simplifying and reducing costs of STR typing for reference samples.