원문정보
Spatial Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA) according to Site Elements of Neighborhood Facilities - Focusing on Utilizing Guideline for Data-driven Design based on Post Occupancy Evaluation(POE) -
초록
영어
This study aims to identify categories for improvement and maintenance in neighborhood facilities by examining priorities and the relationship between importance and performance of both indoor and outdoor spaces using POE. To achieve this, we analyzed 302 responses (top 30% in terms of average space satisfaction) selected from 1,001 responses collected between 2022 and 2023, along with quantitative data related to site elements collected in 2024. First, through frequency analysis, spatial satisfaction in neighborhood facilities was higher in shapes other than irregular shapes, in sites with an area of 1,000㎡ or more, with fewer number of roads adjoining the site, when adjacent to a small road(So-ro) with the maximum road width, and when it is one-way traffic. Second, The rank of importance and the "Concentrate Here" areas for spatial satisfaction categories differ depending on the site shape, site area, number and width of adjoining roads, and traffic way patterns. Third, it implies the possibility of a decision-making tool necessary for building design by reflecting site elements and design requirements going with user satisfaction on an online platform that can be updated. It also shows the necessity for neighborhood facilities, for which a general methodology for design has not been established. This study is in the process of confirming the possibility and concreteness of an online platform that can be used as a tool to support decision-making in the early stages of architectural design based on user satisfaction. It is expected to be differentiated in that it can improve the lifespan and evaluation of buildings and the maintenance period of rental programs, and respects the role of architects.
목차
1. 서론
1.2 연구범위 및 방법
2. 배경적 고찰
2.1 선행연구 분석
2.2 핵심평가지표 도출 및 설문 진행
2.3 분석 방법 설계 및 개요
3. 응답 데이터 일반 빈도분석
3.1 응답자 및 건물 일반 특성
3.2 대지 요인별 빈도분석
4. IPA 및 우선순위 분석 기반대지 요소별 특성 도출
4.1 신뢰도 분석
4.2 중항목 만족도 분석
4.3 상위 30% 응답의 IPA
4.4 대지 요인별 IPA 비교
4.5 대지 요인별 중항목의 우선순위
5. 결론
REFERENCES
