earticle

한국어

Dongyu Hakan(東儒學案), Hoebong Ha Kyung-jin(河謙鎭, 1870∼1946) is a scholar who studied under Myeon-woo Kwak Jong-seok(郭鍾錫, 1846∼1919) and inherited the academic vein of the Hanju (寒洲) school. The fact that he is an ancient emperor who inherited the academic style of the late dynasty and the scholarly style of Nammyung represents the academic character and status of Hoebong. A considerable number of studies have already been submitted on his representative works, Oriental Studies and Simultaneous Painting, and the academic historical recognition of his intermediate work Juja Phonetic similarity is also steadily being carried out in the academic world. However, compared to his status as an influential scholar and writer who made efforts to review and organize traditional scholarship and revive it, not enough research has been conducted on his intellectual background. The existence of the Hoebong Library, which was donated to the Muncheongak Library of Gyeongsang National University in recent years, can be used to understand the intellectual base of Hoebong. As a result of examining the paperbacks of Hoebong Ha Kyung-jin, we were able to examine not only his intellectual base but also the possibility of identifying his network of intellectuals. By keeping the first editions of the Seonhyun Writings, he continued the tradition of the history of Joseon and confirmed his interest in the historical traditions of East Asian history and Joseon history. It reaffirmed its scholarship by collecting the literature of prominent South Korean scholars such as Lee YK and Ahn Jeong-bok, and also had the writings of famous scholars of the time, such as Lee Kun-chang, Cho Hyung-seop, and Lee Byung-hun. At the same time, I was able to confirm a certain amount of interest in arts and art. In addition, I was able to get a glimpse of his writings that respond to the changing current situation and the spirit of resistance against Japan that is inhabiting within him. In this way, although he did not deviate from the constitution of a traditional Confucian scholar, it is possible to confirm the academic strength of Hoebong, who had a relatively rich collection of books based on his interest in various fields. In addition, it can be seen that they are not insensitive to the changes of contemporary scholarship and respond to the changes of the time. If we look at the situation of the anthology, which has not yet been examined, but which is still being answered after his death in 1946, we can see that the nostalgia and enjoyment of the literature of the traditional period is still going on with vigor through the 1950s, which will be another interest in the study of the Hoebong collection.