원문정보
A Study on the Spatial Composition Characteristics of Co-living House in Korea and China
초록
영어
With the development of contemporary economy, people's demand for living has become diversified, no longer treating housing as a space to provide a rest place, but giving housing social attributes, connecting culture, people and society through housing. In order to meet the needs of residents at the economic level and the residential level as well as the communication level, shared housing in South Korea and China occupies an important position in the rental market. Despite the geographical proximity, there are differences in the spatial composition of shared homes. Moreover, there is very little research on co-living house type of shared housing in the two countries, especially on space composition. Therefore, this paper aims to study co-living houses in shared houses in South Korea and China, and make a comparative study on the spatial layout of co-living houses in South Korea and China, and compare and analyze the differences in spatial layout. It is hoped that this research will be helpful to the future development of shared housing in the two countries. Through case investigation and comparative study, this study selected 10 co-living house cases in Korea and China for comparative analysis, and obtained the spatial composition characteristics of co-living houses in the two countries. Moreover, the shared space proportion of co-living houses in the two countries, the types of programs and services provided by co-living houses are investigated. Based on the survey results of the two countries, the spatial composition types of co-living houses are divided into five types: high-rise type, low-rise type, amphitype, general mixed type and unit type. When constructing co-living houses, the location of shared space can be determined according to the height of the building.
목차
1. 서론
1.1 연구배경 및 목적
1.2 연구범위 및 방법
2. 이론적 고찰
2.1 공유주택의 이해 및 분류
2.2 코리빙 하우스의 이해
2.3 선행연구 고찰
3. 한국과 중국의 코리빙 하우스 공간 구성 비교 분석
3.1 대상지 선정
3.2 공유공간 구성 특성 비교
3.3 한국과 중국의 코리빙 하우스 공유공간 비율
4. 결론
REFERENCES
