earticle

영어

The purpose of this study is to present differences of priority with rank in core evaluation index for overall satisfaction on neighborhood facilities between Administrative district(Gu). To this end, this study conducted Post Occupancy Evaluation(POE) and Importance-Performance Analysis(IPA), adding 600 respdondents with 217 neighborhood facilities(total 1,001 respondents and 558 buildings). The Conclusion is as follows; First, in an analysis targeting all respondents, number of roads, vehicle-pedestrian separation(location)/frontality(site plan)/size(appearance)/interior units(unit configuration)/connectivity(environment) were derived as area of “concentrate here.” The top 5 items in rank were circulation, zoning, compartment planning, atmosphere, and landscape. Second, there are significant differences in the index included in the "concentrate here" and ranking of items at the district(gu) level. Finally, this suggests that the index that must be considered in the design of neighborhood facilities varies by district, depending on the satisfaction level, and that the quantitative/qualitative aspects of these differences can be confirmed with further researches on context components. Despite the limitations, this study would be meaningful in that it embodies the potentials in terms of POE with real-time visualization of analysis in on-line flatform.