earticle

영어

This study was conducted to identify the status of IRB deliberation in domestic music therapy-related studies to understand the status of music therapy research ethics and to provide basic data necessary to consider the application of IRB deliberation. The necessity of IRB review for human research dissertation in domestic music therapy graduate schools was investigated, and among the music therapy-related papers published in KCI-accredited (candidate) journals from 2013 to 2022, 131 papers reviewed by IRB were categorized and analyzed. As a result, the proportion of IRB deliberation essentiality was 44% for master’s degrees and 100% for doctorate degrees among domestic music therapy graduate schools. The IRB review rate of music therapy in all KCI-registered journals was 26.1%, and of music therapy specialized journals,「Korean Journal of Music Therapy」 and 「Journal of Music and Human Behavior」was 20.6%, which was lower than the overall rate. By subject classification of academic journals, there were various categories such as 28.2% of social sciences, 27.5% of arts and sports studies, 27.5% of medicine and pharmacology, and 13% of complex sciences, etc. The major of the main author were 61.8% of music therapy and 33.6% of medical nursing. Universities accounted for the largest number of IRB review institutions with 61.8%. The most common type of research was experimental research at 61.8%, and of intervention was listening at 22.9%. Based on the results, it was proposed to raise awareness of the need for IRB review and to make IRB review mandatory throughout the domestic music therapy academic community.

한국어

본 연구는 국내 음악치료 관련 연구에서의 IRB 심의 현황을 파악하여 음악치료 연구윤리의 현재를 이해하고, 향후 IRB 심의 적용을 고려하는데 필요한 기초자료를 제공하기 위한 목적으로 수행되었 다. 이를 위해 국내 음악치료 전공 대학원의 인간대상연구 학위논문 IRB 심의 필수여부를 조사하 였고, 2013년부터 2022년까지의 KCI에 등재(후보)된 학술지에 게재된 음악치료 관련 논문 중 IRB 심의를 거친 131편의 논문을 범주화하여 분석하였다. 연구결과, 국내 음악치료 전공 대학원 중 IRB 심의가 필수인 곳의 비율은 석사학위 44%, 박사학위 100%였다. KCI 등재 전체 학술지의 음 악치료 IRB 심의비율은 26.1%였으며, 음악치료 전문 학술지인 「한국음악치료학회지」와 「인간행동 과 음악연구」의 IRB 심의 비율은 20.6%로 전체 비율보다 낮은 수준이었다. 학술지 주제 분류별로 는 사회과학 28.2%, 예술·체육학과 의약학 각 27.5%, 복합학 13% 등으로 다양하게 나타났으며, 논문 주 저자의 전공영역은 음악치료 61.8%, 의료간호 33.6% 순이었다. IRB 심의기관은 대학이 61.8%로 가장 많았다. 연구유형으로는 실험연구가 61.8%, 중재유형은 감상이 22.9%로 가장 많았 다. 결과를 토대로 국내 음악치료 학계전반에 IRB 심의 필요에 대한 의식 고취와 IRB 심의 의무 화를 제언하였다.