earticle

논문검색

특강

The Many Faces of ‘KES’(‘것’) in Korean : Theoretical Controversies and Convergences

목차

1. Introduction
1.1 Previous Data Sets
1.2 New Data Sets
1.3 Theoretical Controversies
1.4 Goals and Proposals
2. Lexeme vs. Clitic vs. Anti-Clitic
2.1 Theoretical Preliminaries
2.2 Evidence for 'KES' as Anti-Clitic
2.3 것noun-lxm as Lexeme : Noun
2.4 것comp-lxm as Lexeme : Complementizer
3. 것n-anti-clitic as Nominalization Anti-Clitic
3.1 것theme-n-anti-clitic : Theme Nominalization Anti-Clitic
3.2 것instrument-n-anti-clitic : Instrument Nominalization Anti-Clitic
3.3 것degree-n-anti-clitic : Degree Nominalization Anti-Clitic
3.4 것event-n-anti-clitic : Event Nominalization Anti-Clitic
4. IHRC as &quat;EVENT FOR PARTICIPANT&quat; Metonymy
4.1 Adnominal clauses + 것event-n-anti-clitic vs. Internally-Headed Relative Clauses (IHRCs) 
4.2 Evidence for Metonymy
4.3 Problems Solved
5. Conclusion
Selected References

저자정보

  • Byong-Rae Ryu 류병래. Department of Linguistics Chungnam National University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 7,000원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.