earticle

논문검색

Competing Discourses on Three Ming Emperors and the Significance of Their Canonization in Late Chosŏn Korea

원문정보

Seunghyun HAN

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

In 1749, King Yŏngjo and his courtiers began to venerate the Ming emperors Hongwu and Chongzhen at Taebodan in the courtyard of Ch’angdŏk Palace. This was in addition to Wanli, who had been honored since 1704. During the late Chosŏn period, the court regularly held rituals to worship these emperors. This study examines court discussions to assess the impact of this veneration on the image of the emperors. These show that prior to 1749, Chosŏn monarchs and ministers often viewed the emperors negatively, while at the same time lauding their virtues. The study also explores the process through which the court constructed orthodox narratives on the emperors, a process which bestowed the emperors with certain merits and virtues. These images became the only legitimate means through which to view them and were reinforced by regular state rituals. After 1749, the emperors became objects of supreme veneration rather than objective evaluation. Ming loyalism discouraged voices critical of the Ming or disrespectful to the emperors, an approach that supplanted a more critical Confucian interpretation.

목차

Abstract
Introduction
Court Perception of the Three Ming Emperors before the Reign of Yŏngjo
The Hongwu Emperor
The Wanli Emperor
The Chongzhen Emperor
The Ambivalence of Conflicting Imperial Images and Efforts to Improve Them
Enshrinement of the Three Ming Emperors in Taebodan
The Mok T’aesŏk Controversy of 1827
Conclusions
References

저자정보

  • Seunghyun HAN A professor of the department of history, Konkuk University, Korea.

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 6,700원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.