초록
영어
German can undergo word order change into [IO-DO-V] in double object construction(DOC), and Korean also can. However, two languages exhibit different typological properties and derivation aspects in this word order type. The purpose of this paper is to argue the followings: First, in terms of typology, whereas German is a language with a variety of DOCs, Korean is one with highly limited DOCs. Second, whereas the [IO-DO-V] word order DOC type of German is derived by ‘a prior V raising plus remant vP or ApplP topicalization’ mechanism depending on syntactic environments, that of Korean by scrambling. Third, the [IO-DO-V] word order DOC type of Korean has a constraint by which an unsaturated function cannot be scrambled.
목차
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Previous Analysis: German
2.1. Abels(2003): A Prior V Raising plus Remnant VP Topicalization
2.2. Revisited: A Prior V Raising plus Remnant vP or ApplP Topicalization
3. Korean: The [IO-DO-V] Word Order DOC Type
3.1. The Remnant Movement of XP: Unavailable
3.2. Proposal: Scrambling
3.3. Semantic Completenss Diagnostics
4. Concluding Remarks
References
1. Introduction
2. Previous Analysis: German
2.1. Abels(2003): A Prior V Raising plus Remnant VP Topicalization
2.2. Revisited: A Prior V Raising plus Remnant vP or ApplP Topicalization
3. Korean: The [IO-DO-V] Word Order DOC Type
3.1. The Remnant Movement of XP: Unavailable
3.2. Proposal: Scrambling
3.3. Semantic Completenss Diagnostics
4. Concluding Remarks
References
키워드
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보