earticle

영어

The aim of this paper is to provide the directions of the detailed listing guidelines by the comparison study on the UK and Korean Designation system of Modern and Contemporary architectural cultural heritage. For the guidelines, based on the value described by the committee members of korean cultural heritage administration in the reason for registration, 18 detailed value criteria mainly applied to the present architectural cultural heritage buildings were derived: then, the hierarchical order of the detailed criteria according to frequencies of detailed value descriptions on building types was listed with percentages in order to extract the certain value between the committee members’ descriptions on registered buildings. As a result, firstly the detailed criteria of Korean Modern and Contemporary architectural properties for the guidelines as registered cultural heritage was generally similar with the legal standards of UK listed buildings. However, the value of Korean criteria was more weighed on architectural background and procedure of cultural heritage buildings on the social historical context of the times than detailed and clear description of building itself. Secondly, according to the building types, architectural style with building structure was highly and frequently regarded as the main detailed standards; however, the detailed descriptions were limited to generally visual analysis without mentioning specific value differences between building types. Therefore, the conclusion of this comparison study between the UK and Korean designation system will be to suggest detail criteria of the guidelines as value plates for Korean modern and contemporary architectural cultural heritage.