원문정보
초록
영어
We study confirmed the relationship between the adversity index, entrepreneurial orientation, and organizational learning competency perceived by organizational members as follows. First, the adversity index showed a positive (+) effect on entrepreneurial orientation (hypothesis 1) and organizational learning competency (hypothesis 2). Second, the entrepreneurial orientation was statistically significant in organizational learning competency (hypothesis 3). Third, the partial mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation (Hypothesis 4) was confirmed in the process of the adversity index affecting organizational learning competency. Meanwhile, the main implications of this study are as follows. First, it is the aspect that provides additional theoretical implications in the reality that studies on the adversity index and entrepreneurial orientation that affect organizational learning competency are lacking. Second, it is the aspect that the importance of adversity index and start-up orientation was confirmed in improving organizational learning competency based on securing differentiated competitiveness for the advancement of the organization's sustainability management system. In addition, it is the aspect of drawing practical implications for strategic human resource management and human resource development to systematically improve it.
목차
1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Setting
2.1. The Relationship between Adversity Index and Entrepreneurial Orientation.
2.2. The Relationship between Adversity Index and Organizational Learning Competency
2.3. The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Organizational Learning Competency
2.4. The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation
3. The Research Method
3.1. The Research Model
3.2. The Data Collection and Analysis Method
3.3. The Operational Definition of Variables
4. The Research Results
4.1 The Demographic Characteristics
4.2 The Descriptive Statistics, Correlation and Reliability Coefficient Results
4.3 The Verification of Convenience of the Same Method
4.4 The Measurement Model Analysis
4.4 The Structural Model Analysis
4.5 The Hypothesis test
5. Conclusion
References