earticle

논문검색

[원저]

코로나 루머의 사실검증 마크에 대한 반응 연구 : 절반의 거짓과 절반의 사실은 다른가?

원문정보

Response to the Fact-check Mark on Rumor: Half-False vs. Half-True?

이혜규, 김자림

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Purpose: This study investigated the framing effects of fact-check mark on rumor believability, specifically when the fact-checking evaluations are inconclusive. Method: Using two rumors regarding COVID-19, an online experiment (Fact-checking mark: half-true vs. half-false vs. withheld) with 273 Korean adults was conducted. Result: The results showed that fact-checking mark framed as half-false reduced rumor believability, whereas that framed as half-true increased rumor believability. The rumor believability changes in the half-false condition was found to be greater than those in the withheld condition. Also, the exposure to inconclusive fact-checking marks increased the rumor believability of individuals who had lower levels of prior rumor beliefs and decreased the rumor believability of individuals who had higher levels of prior rumor beliefs. Conclusion: This study enhances our understanding of how fact-checking evaluations influence individuals’ rumor believability.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
A. 메시지 프레이밍
B. 루머에 대한 사전 신뢰
C. 사실검증 마크와 루머에 대한 사전신뢰의 상호작용
Ⅱ. 연구 방법
A. 연구 참가자 및 절차
B. 측정 도구: 루머에 대한 신뢰 변화
Ⅲ. 연구 결과
A. 조작 점검
B. 연구 결과
Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론
참고문헌

저자정보

  • 이혜규 Hyegyu Lee. 한동대학교 경영경제학부
  • 김자림 Jarim Kim. 연세대학교 언론홍보영상학부

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 4,000원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.