학술지 논문게재와 심사자의 학력・연구경력의 상관관계에 대해서


Correlation between academic paper publication and the academic background・research history of the judges


피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)



This study is to understand the appropriateness of the review in the process of reviewing papers by Korean academic societies. In other words, we are investigating what kind of review is being conducted in the process of reviewing papers, and aim to make proposals for a more rational and reliable system. Since various factors are involved in the publication of submitted papers, comprehensive research is needed, but this time, we will focus on the aspect of judges. In other words, he raised the issue of the influence of the qualifications of the reviewers and their tendencies on the dissertation review. In this way, by classifying the basic data in the dissertation review process, it became clear that although there is a certain flow as a whole, homogeneity cannot be ensured by the method of scoring each reviewer. After all, in order to prevent such deviations in the scores of multiple reviewers, we changed the direction to a system in which one reviewer is in charge of multiple papers in the same field, and dissertations were distributed to a large number of reviewers with different tendencies. The current system of entrusting review should be reviewed. As a future task, let’s try to understand the inconsistency of the examination and the difference in the score due to the tendency of the examiner by comparing the range of the score of each judge with the poster one by one.


本研究は韓国の学会の論文審査過程において、その審査の適正性を把握するためのものである。すなわち、論文審査の過程でどのような審査が行われているかを調査し、より合理的でかつ信頼性を有するシステムへの提言を目指している。投稿論文の掲載の可否にはいろいろな要素がかかわってくるので総合的な研究が必要であるが、今回は、特に審査者という側面に集中して考察した。つまり、審査者の資質とその傾向性などが論文審査に与える影響について問題提起をした。 このように、論文審査過程における基礎データを分類することにより、全体的にはある程度の流れはあるが、一人一人の審査委員の点数のつけ方では同質性が確保できていないことが明らかになった。結局このような複数審査者の点数の偏差を防ぐためには、同じ分野の複数の論文を一人の審査者が担当するシステムへと方向を変えて、傾向性の異なる多数の審査者にばらばらと論文審査を任せる現行のシステムを見直すべきである。今後の課題としては、各審査委員の点数の幅を投稿者と一々照らし合わせてみることにより、審査の非一貫性及び審査者の傾向性による点数の隔たりを読み解いていこう。


1. 서론
2. 동료심사와 그 문제점
3. 한국일본언어문화학회 심사자 분석
3.1 편집위원 심사자 분석을 위한 기준 설정
3.2 편집위원 심사자 점수 분포 및 경향 분석
3.3 심사자와 투고자와의 연관 관계 분석
4. 일본학회의 경우 비교
5. 결론



  • 권혁인 Kwon, HyukIn. 光云大学校 インゼニウム学部大学 副教授


자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 5,400원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.