원문정보
초록
영어
This study examined the possible washback effects of the latest version of the College English Test–Band Four (CET-4) test from the test-takers’ perspective, focusing primarily on the listening section. Using survey methodology, 305 Chinese EFL learners from both a first- and a second-tier city in China rated the difficulty, usefulness, and level of authenticity of the CET-4 listening, the non-listening test sections, the degree to which they adapted their learning behaviors to the test, and how much their teachers adapted their instruction to address the CET-4. The results indicated learners from the second-tier Chinese city considered the CET-4 more difficult, authentic, and useful, and that it had more of an impact on teaching and learning. Despite these differences, both groups rated the listening section as more difficult, less useful, and less authentic than the other sections of the test. Finally, the listening section was perceived to have more of an impact on student’s learning than the perceived impact on teaching. Based on these results, we argue that the possible washback effects of a test should be a fundamental consideration in the development and validation of a test, not just an afterthought (Bachman, 2005; Chalhoub-Deville & O’Sullivan, 2020; Messick, 1996).
목차
Introduction
Conceptualizing Test Washback
Literature Review
Current Study
Research Questions
Methods
Results
Reliability
Research Question 1a. Difficulty, Usefulness, and Authenticity Levels of the CET-4 Listening in First- versus Second-Tier Cities
Research Question 1b. Difficulty, Usefulness, and Authenticity Levels of the Non-Listening Sections of the CET-4 for First- versus Second-Tier Cities
Research Question 1c. Difficulty, Usefulness, and Authenticity Levels of the CET-4 Listening versus Non-listening Sections
Research Question 2. The Impact of the CET-4 Listening on Students’ English Learning Behaviors and Their Instructors’ Teaching
Discussion
Conclusion
Acknowledgment
The Authors
References
Appendix