원문정보
A study on the usefulness of standard evaluation tools for ambulance ride practices of paramedic students
초록
영어
Purpose: This study tests the validity of a standard evaluation tool of ambulance ride practices with new evaluation items and supports its application by 119 preceptors. Methods: We tested the validity of standard evaluation items collected from 19 on-site professionals assessing ambulance ride practices. New evaluation items, ‘understanding of emergency rescue equipment’ and ‘ability to communicate’, were added as additional criteria. The modified Delphi technique was used to test the three evaluation areas and ten evaluation items. We used the analytic hierarchy process to analyze the weighting value of the reconstructed evaluation tool model. Results: All three evaluation areas and 10 evaluation items within the standard evaluation tools used for ambulance ride practices corresponded with the consistency index, degree of convergence, and agreement in the modified Delphi panel. Conclusion: These results provide evidence of the consistency and usefulness behind preceptors’ use of this standard evaluation tool in ambulance ride practice.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
1. 연구의 필요성
2. 연구의 목적
Ⅱ. 연구방법
1. 연구대상 및 델파이 패널 선정
2. 연구절차 및 방법
3. 자료 분석 및 결과의 해석
Ⅲ. 연구결과
1. 표준 평가항목의 중요수준에 대한 타당도
2. 표준 평가항목의 활용수준에 대한 타당도
3. Delphi 패널에 의해 추가된 평가항목의 NVivo 가중률과 우선순위
4. Delphi 조사 결과에 따른 재구조화된 평가항목의 AHP 분석 결과
Ⅳ. 고찰
References