원문정보
Analyzing of the Difference in the Influence Relationship between Perceived Risk, Preference, Visiting Intention According to Tourism Experience : Focused on Daegu Metropolitan City
초록
영어
The purpose of this study was to analyze the difference in the influence relationship between perceived risk, preference and visiting intention according to tourism experience. To accomplish the purpose, data were collected using on-line and on-site survey by tourist consumers from June 22 to July 2, 2020. Several statistical techniques (i.e. exploratory factor analysis, reliability test, ANOVA with a post hoc Bonferroni, multiple liner regression and univariate analysis of variance) were used to analysis the data collected. The results revealed that the sub-variable (e.g., physical risk) of perceived risk was not significantly related with tourism preference, but the other sub-variables (e.g., functional risk, economic risk) of the perceived risk were found to have a partially significant effect. Moreover, the relationship between the sub-variable (e.g., functional risk) of perceived risk and preference was partially significant, and also their relationship was moderated according to the types of tourism experience. Thus, these findings suggest that it is necessary to establish a promotional strategy that can provide utility and value for tourists' time investment and expenditure by re-introducing tourism products and services that can renew their aspect as a tourist destination. Also, it is important to minimize negative emotions and attitudes toward tourist destinations to induce tourists' tourism behavior. To do so, local autonomy and governments make more efforts not only to develop tourism products that can satisfy the needs of tourist consumers, but also to provide information about tourism destination that can promote the psychological stability of tourists.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
1. 위험지각(perceived risk)
2. 선호도(perference)
3. 방문의도 및 관광경험
Ⅲ. 연구설계
1. 연구모형 및 가설 설정
2. 변수의 조작적 정의 및 측정
3. 자료수집 및 분석방법
Ⅳ. 분석결과
1. 표본의 인구통계학적 특성
2. 연구변수의 타당성 및 신뢰도 분석
3. 연구가설 검증
Ⅴ. 결론 및 시사점
참고문헌