earticle

영어

In the East Asian thought the other against the Confucianism is the Lao-Chuang's thought, and in the European thought the other against the Platonism is the Derrida's Deconstructionism. Between the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought, there are some different contents and some similar contents, but the basic root of thought is very similar. - the opening Acceptablity among Differences · the inter-Textuality of Differance and the Hyun in Tao · inter-Relational Monogenesis · Bio-naturalism. It is very important that the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought encounter at this time and this spot across 2500 years and Eurasia continental. But the Derrida's thought was staying at Deconstruction against main stream of European thought and didn't suggest a new thinking vision, and the Lao-Chuang's thought had hung around nihilism and seclusion. Moreover the Derrida's thought is very dizzy and difficult, and the Lao-Chuang's thought is very obscure and bragging. If we will be not escaped from these problems, this meaningful contact will not begin to develop. Therefore we must effort to overcome these problems containing this contact. For this purpose, I will try to approach a method called 'the thinking frame of LiangGeuk and LiangMyun'. It criticise and will overcome the problems rooted in ‘the Western Dichotomy' and ‘the Eastern EumYang'. My thinking frame has similar contents and different contents with the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought. I will try to construct a new contact of the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought with the similar contents, and to overcome the problems of the Derrida's thought and the Lao-Chuang's thought with the different contents.