원문정보
Corpus-based Contrastive Analysis of Hedges in Chinese and Korean for Korean Teaching: Focusing on the Corresponding Expressions of ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이다’ in the Chinese Language.
초록
영어
Although there are many previous studies that examined quantitative fuzzy semantics, the contrastive study of hedges between the Chinese and Korean languages are still undetermined. Whether one is able to accurately use the hedge expressions reflects the pragmatic competence of the foreign language student. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the corresponding expression of the Korean hedges expression ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이다’ in official Chinese speech texts, and the application of the results from this research as a pragmatic approach to the teaching scene of Korean as a foreign language education to Chinese students. In this paper, the author selected eleven official speeches by the heads of the Chinese government and their Korean translations as the base of parallel corpus. By using the corpus, statistical methods and the pragmatic approach, we found 104 corpus pairs of Korean hedge expression ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이다’ in these eleven official speeches. The results of this study show that the Korean hedges expression ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이다’ is the translation of various Chinese expressions from the original speeches. Moreover, 51.92% of them are unmarked Chinese expressions. It shows that not only were the suggestive expressions translated into Korean euphemism, but also the translators used the Korean hedges expression ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이다’ consciously in order to make it suitable for Korean readers. It suggests that we need to demonstrate the hedges expression ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이다’ in Korean teaching context, in order to improve Chinese students’ pragmatic competence and increase the Korean learners and readers’ acceptance of such expressions.
목차
1. 서론
2. 선행연구 검토
2.1. 한국어 헤지 표현에 관한 연구
2.2. 중국어 헤지 표현에 관한 연구
2.3. 중국인 한국어 학습자를 위한 헤지 표현 교육에 관한 연구
2.4. 헤지 표현 ‘(으)ㄹ 것이다’를 다룬 연구
3. 연구 대상 및 방법
4. 연구 결과 및 논의
4.1. 의지를 나타내는 ‘将, 必将’에 대응하는 경우
4.2. 연결사 ‘(只有…才)能; (只要…)就’에 대응하는 경우
4.3. 중국어에 대응 표지가 없는 경우
5. 한국어 교재의 ‘-(으)ㄹ 것이다’ 제시 양상 및 제언
6. 결론
참고문헌