원문정보
調解制度需要真正的調解： 在澳門應如何看待預期的強制性調解法律框架
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
초록
영어
Some cultural backgrounds display enhanced proclivity to the thriving of alternative dispute resolution than others. This axiom is at the heart of this paper. Prone cultural backgrounds can augment the adherence to Amicable Dispute Resolution (hereinafter, ADR). Maximizing and optimizing ADR is not only trendy but duly necessary for the sake of the long-term stability of the dispute resolution worldwide. Macau is no exception. In order to attain this laudable goal, Macau must embrace a court-connected mandatory mediation with an easy opt-out in the forthcoming future.
목차
Abstract
§§ 1. Introduction: Mediation needs to be Mediation
§§ 2. Article 36. º, § 1 of Macau Basic Law: a human right?
§§ 3. What makes the Chinese Confucianism so special: the three pillars of social harmony, maintenance of cordial relations and face-saving
§§ 4. How should a prospective court-connected mandatory mediation in Macau look like in order to dispel the heinous Sporting Theory of Justice (Roscoe Pound)
§§ 5. Concluding remarks
List of References
§§ 1. Introduction: Mediation needs to be Mediation
§§ 2. Article 36. º, § 1 of Macau Basic Law: a human right?
§§ 3. What makes the Chinese Confucianism so special: the three pillars of social harmony, maintenance of cordial relations and face-saving
§§ 4. How should a prospective court-connected mandatory mediation in Macau look like in order to dispel the heinous Sporting Theory of Justice (Roscoe Pound)
§§ 5. Concluding remarks
List of References
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보