원문정보
Reconsideration about the theory that Santei-syunba is the author
초록
영어
In this paper, the purpose is to verity the works that Santei Syunba was said to be the author in the previous research and the date of establishment of such works. The theory that the so-called “Kanzendo” is the Ikku Ⅱ or Ikku Ⅲ is wrong, it certify that the author of the “Ekyodai-sugataawase”, “Karukaya-dosin” and the second volume of “Yakusya-mitate-gozyusanchugi” is not Syunba. The formation time of the confusing Ninzyobon “Syunjyu-hutakikusa” was clarified by the type of signature. In other words, it was proved that first and second volumes were published until the fall of 1844, and that after third volume, it was a work by Umehiko, who was different person from Syunba.
목차
2. 春馬作者説及び成立時期再考
2.1 勧善堂こと二代目または三代目一九説の検証
2.2 見立絵本『滑稽絵姿合』の改題本『絵兄弟姿合』の三亭春馬作者説再考
2.3 合巻『苅萱桑門』、見立絵本『俳優見立五十三次』二編の春馬作者説再考
2.4 人情本『春秋二季種』の成立時期再考、署名の類型より
3. 結語
参考文献