원문정보
초록
영어
The degree of mutual understanding between nursing students and instructors regarding simulation-based education remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify the subjectivity of nursing students and instructors about simulation-based learning, and was intended to expand the mutual understand by employing the co-orientation model. Q-methodology was used to identify the perspectives of 46 nursing students and 38 instructors. Perception types found among students in relation to simulation-based learning were developmental training seekers, instructor-dependent seekers, and learning achievement seekers. The instructors estimated the student perception types as passive and dependent, positive commitment, demanding role as facilitators, and psychological burden. Perception types found among instructors included nursing capacity enhancement seekers, self-reflection seekers, and reality seekers. The students classified the instructors' perception types as nursing competency seekers, learning reinforcement seekers, and debriefingoriented seekers. As a result of the analysis of these relations in the co-orientation model, instructors identified psychological burden and passive and dependent cognitive frameworks among students; however, these were not reported in the students’ perspectives. Likewise, the reality seekers type found among the perception types of instructors was not identified by the students. These findings can help develop and implement simulationbased curricula aimed at maximizing the learning effect of nursing students
목차
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
3. METHODS
2.1 Study Design
2.2 Q-Methodology
2.3 Q-population
2.4 Q-sample
2.5 Selection of P-sample
2.6 Q-sorting and data collection method
2.7 Data Analysis
2.8 Ethical considerations
3. RESULTS
3.1 Nursing students' own viewpoints
3.2 Perception of instructors as estimated by nursing students
3.3 Instructors’ own viewpoints
3.4 Perceptions of nursing students as estimated by their instructors
3.5 Analysis using the co-orientation model
4. DISCUSSION
5. CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCE
