earticle

논문검색

Regular Article

The Process and Method to Set a Mountainous Scenic Site’s Designated Area

원문정보

초록

영어

A “Scenic Site” is an official heritage category legally defined as a “scenic site of outstanding artistic value with excellent scenic views.” However, the subjective interpretation of the term causes several problems. This study suggested a systematic, organized process of designating a listed area as a scenic site after careful and detailed quantitative and qualitative analysis. Indicators were identified for each of the two analyses, and then scored and weighted. Quantitative indicators were distributed within 5 points for each indicator. Water, which is a natural indicator, based on distance from river boundaries. Forest landscapes were assigned in consideration of forest physiognomy and age class. Land use was allocated in consideration of land cover type and, in case of development site, ‘-’ score was assigned. Cultural heritage conservation area, which is historical and cultural indicator, was distributed by distance within a maximum of 500 meters. Visibility, an indicator of landscape value, was assigned according to the frequency of visibility. The weight of each indicator was calculated by considering the value of each item. The weight of distribution of cultural resources is relatively high, while other items were set the same. In case of land use, however, ‘-’ score was given according to the grade. Qualitative indicators, on the other hand, were considered terrain, landscape zone, ownership, intellectual boundary, and land category. The applicability of the proposed process and method was examined by applying the existing methods and criteria used for designating scenic spots. Opinions of subject-matter experts were incorporated in the identification of the indicators and in the result review stage. In the future, it is necessary to apply this method while designating scenic sites so as to establish an objective, scientific designation process.

목차

Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
The selection process for evaluation indicators
Evaluation indicators’ ratings and weights
Selection of qualitative indicators
Indicator’s application process
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References

저자정보

  • Gab Soo Han Department of Environmental Landscape Architecture, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung 25457, Republic of Korea
  • Soonki Kim Division of Design, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Kore
  • Kwang Min Ham Gangwon Urban Regeneration Center, Research Institute for Gangwon, Chuncheon 24265, Republic of Korea

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 4,000원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.