earticle

영어

This study analyzed discourse on the issue of gender conflict currently apparent in media reports and observed the differences among media companies. Using the critical discourse analysis method, it first revealed the characteristics of media report texts, observed how the gender conflict issue connects with external discourse, and analyzed the social practice aspect of discourse. Analyses were made with regard to intertextuality among gender conflict discourses; reverse discrimination discourses, which were created centering on online communities; and feminism discourses held after the Megalia issue, along with the main reporting methods of the media, which serves as a mediator, and how aspects that ultimately connect gender conflict to discourses of generation conflict or government support are revealed. Based on such research, improvements were requested in the ethical dimensions of journalism such as those related to issues of direct quotation reports of the media and issues of formal objectivism, along with the importance of fact-checking and in-depth reports. In the reporting process, the conservative media tended to describe feminism and women as the factors that cause conflict while maintaining the good and bad structure as the center of conflict. As a result, it can be said that gender conflicts are caused by the complaints of women. However, as the government approval rate becomes an issue, conservative media argued that the policy failure is caused by the policy of feminism, but it shows political bias by highlighting it as an element of gender conflict. Moreover, the problem is that it is unclear whether these policies actually cause conflict. On the other hand, rather than using gender conflict as a material, the way in which the progressive media constructs the discourse, including the voices that lead the protests or claim gender equality, it can be said that it is a strategy to switch conflicts into conversation. To increase the quality of discourse and construct the meaning of sex discrimination, it is necessary to discuss not only the personal experiences but also the structural factors. Moreover, many citations have used online sources, and online communities and Naver portals have come up with stimulating comments under the attention economy structure. If the media would deliver it without filtration, it would introduce extreme opinions in the public sphere. In addition, the media should actively review the truthful effects of presenting the voices of men and women without explanations and structural frameworks. Therefore, if the media would only report in the form of direct quotes, the reader would need to think critically about it. The bias of citation according to the political tendency of the media also affects the direction of the article. It is the natural duty of the press to pursue objectivity and fairness, and several previous studies have pointed out the implications of the biases of the sources themselves. The biased nature of citation sources should be an important consideration of journalism because it affects the quality of news coverage, makes it difficult to understand matters, and affects media judgments about what matters. In the report about gender conflicts, the media used more he-sources, unlikely reflecting gender sensitivity.

한국어

이 연구는 최근의 미디어 보도에서 드러나는 성별 갈등 문제화 담론을 분석하고 언론사별 보도 방식의 차이가 있는지를 살펴보았다. 비판적 담 론 분석 방법을 활용하여 미디어 보도 텍스트의 특성을 드러내고, 성별 갈등 이슈가 외부 담론과 어떤 방식으로 연결되는지를 살펴 담론의 사회 적 실천 양상을 분석하였다. 메갈리아 이슈 이후의 페미니즘 담론, 온라 인 커뮤니티를 중심으로 생성되어온 역차별 담론이 성별 갈등 담론과 어 떤 상호텍스트성을 보이는지, 그리고 이를 매개하는 언론 보도의 주요 보 도 방식은 무엇인지, 성별 갈등이 종국적으로는 세대 갈등 혹은 정부 지 지도에 대한 담론과 접합하는 양상은 어떻게 드러나는지를 분석하였다. 이러한 연구 결과를 토대로, 미디어의 성인지 감수성 제고, 직접 인용 보 도와 형식적 객관주의의 문제, 사실 확인과 심층 보도의 중요성 등 저널 리즘 윤리 차원의 제고를 요청하였다.