원문정보
초록
영어
Digital platforms characterized by network effects enable provisioning of various types of services and provide a mechanism for linking producers and consumers. Identifying the key Quality of Service attributes of such platforms is vital for their continued success and growth. In this paper, a set of quality attributes for platforms is first extracted from different extant quality models. Then actual user feedback data from three platform providers are analysed and mapped against the set of quality attributes to determine the key attributes that are relevant. These findings are corroborated with qualitative data from interviews of different stakeholders. The results show that service quality characteristics are important to the success of platforms. Functional characteristics of platforms assume importance where the digital contributions of the platform is higher. Apart from these, ‘fitness for use’ as a major determinant of quality is also important in digital platforms.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Platform and Quality Attributes
2.1. Categories of Platforms
2.2. Quality Model and Attributes
Ⅲ. Methodology and Data collection
3.1. The Quality Attribute Set
3.2. Analysis and Validation
3.3. User Feedback Data Collection
3.4. Details of Sample Size Calculations and Sampling Technique
3.5. Coding and Mapping Attributes
3.6. Data from Platform and Service Providers
Ⅳ. Data analysis and Results
4.1. Quantitative Analysis Results
4.2. Qualitative Analysis Results
Ⅴ. Conclusions
5.1. Implications for Platform Providers
5.2. Limitations and Scope for Future Work
Acknowledgements
저자정보
참고문헌
- 1Allahbakhsh, M., Benatallah, B., Ignjatovic, A., Motahari-Nezhad, H. R., Bertino, E., and Dustdar, S. (2013). Quality control in crowdsourcing systems:Issues and directions. IEEE Internet Computing, 17(2), 76-81.
- 2Axelsson, J., and Skoglund, M. (2016). Quality assurance in software ecosystems: A systematic literature mapping and research agenda. Journal of Systems and Software, 114, 69-81.
- 3Behkamal, B., Kahani, M., and Akbari, M. K. (2009). Customizing ISO 9126 quality model for evaluation of B2B applications. Information and Software Technology, 51(3), 599-609.
- 4BusinessDictionary.com. Website. Accessed April 09, 2018, at http://www.businessdictionary.com
- 5Cavano, J. P., and McCall, J. A. (1978, January). A framework for the measurement of software quality. In ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review (Vol. 7, No. 3-4, pp. 133-139). ACM.
- 6Changing Gears 2020. (2017) Retrieved 18-May-2017from http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/changinggears-2020.aspx
- 7Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (pp. 146-166). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
- 8Crosby, P. B. (1980). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. Mentor.
- 9Dictionary.com. Website. Accessed April 10, 2018at http://www.dictionary.com
- 10Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., and Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.