earticle

논문검색

Review Article

Exercise interventions to improve postural malalignments in head, neck, and trunk among adolescents, adults, and older people : systematic review of randomized controlled trials

원문정보

Mohammad Bayattork, Margrethe Bordado Sköld, Emil Sundstrup, Lars Louis Andersen

한국운동재활학회 JER Vol.16 No.1 2020.02 pp.36-48
피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Despite the widespread use of postural correction in exercise interven-tions, limited experimental evidence exists for its effectiveness. The present study aimed to systematically review the literature on the effi-cacy of exercise interventions in improving postural malalignment in head, neck, and trunk. A systematic review was performed by screen-ing four scientific databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane database) for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English from 1996–2019. The review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement guidelines. Two researchers independently performed study screening, extracting data and assessing the risk of bias for each included study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for evaluating the risk of bias. A total of 22 RCTs comprising 1,209 participants were identified for in-clusion in the review. There was a high risk of bias across most of the included studies (12 studies). Only two studies were classified as low risk of bias, and eight studies were classified as moderate risk of bias. The intervention duration ranged from 2 to 13 weeks, frequency from 2 to 4 days per week, and duration of each session between 15 to 60 min. The insufficiency and quality of included studies did not allow an inte-grated assessment of the efficacy of exercise interventions on postural malalignments; however, the positive effects noticed in most of the studies indicate some advantages but underscores the necessity of ad-equately designed RCTs in this field.

목차

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Protocol and registration
Eligibility criteria for considering studies for this review
Information sources and search strategy
Study records
Risk of bias assessment from individual studies
Analysis and GRADE approach
RESULTS
Study selection and characteristics
Risk of bias and quality of evidence within studies
DISCUSSION
The key issues impacting on the outcome
Future research priorities
Limitations
CONCLUSIONS
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
REFERENCES

저자정보

  • Mohammad Bayattork Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, Faculty of Humanities Science, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Margrethe Bordado Sköld National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark, Department of Occupational and Social Medicine, Holbæk University Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
  • Emil Sundstrup National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Lars Louis Andersen National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      ※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

      • 4,500원

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.