원문정보
초록
영어
Purpose: This study examined the effects of wheelchair handle directions on the trunk muscle activity of adult males when climbing ramps. It also evaluated the wheelchair attendant’s physical discomfort during tasks. Methods: Healthy males aged over 20 years were chosen and the direction of wheelchair handle grip was randomly selected. The grips included a general grip with ulnar deviation, a medial grip with wrist pronation, and a neutral grip with a neutral wrist. The trunk muscle activity was measured using surface electromyography. Furthermore, the physical discomfort of wheelchair attendants was subjectively evaluated using the Borg CR-10 Scale, which rates the perceived exertion. In addition, the SPSS 18.0 program was used perform repeated measure ANOVA to compare muscle activity and subjective discomfort during the interventions. The contrast test was also conducted with a significance level (α) of 0.05. Results: There was significant difference between the general grip and the medial grip in the rhomboid major muscle and the lumbar erector spinae muscle (p<0.05). In addition, there was significant difference between the general grip and the neutral grip in the rhomboid major muscle and the lumbar erector spinae muscle (p<0.05). Further, there was significant difference between the general grip and the neutral grip in subjective discomfort (p<0.05). Conclusion: In this study, adult male trunk muscle activity and subjective discomfort were lowest when using the neutral grip while climbing ramps. Accordingly, we suggest that neutral grips will help improve the function of the musculoskeletal system and reduce the subjective discomfort by putting less strain on the trunk muscles and maximizing efficiency with less force.
목차
Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. Method
1. Subjects
2. Measurement tools
3. Measurement method
4. Statistical analyses
Ⅲ. Result
1. General characteristics of the research subjects
2. Comparison of trunks muscle activity
3. Comparison of muscular activities of the serratus anterior during each intervention method
4. Comparison of muscular activities of the rhomboid major during each intervention method
5. Comparison of muscular activities of the lumbar erector spinae during each intervention method
6. Comparison of subjective discomfort during each intervention method
Ⅳ. Discussion
Ⅴ. Conclusion
References