원문정보
피인용수 : 0건 (자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)
초록
영어
Comparing different points and common points about crisis management technical terms among Korean, Chinese and Japanese language can be helpful to understand each country’s characteristics. By comparing 12 technical terms, this study concludes that Korea and China are government-initiated but put citizens before government while Japanese case is led by civil society but they put government before citizens at least in the terms’ uses. Accordingly, it is useful to focus on Japanese civil society even if it is apparently not strong.
목차
ABSTRACT
Introduction
Legal systems and technical terms pertaining to crisis management in Korea, China and Japan
Legal systems pertaining to crisis management in Korea, China and Japan
Crisis management related technical terms in Korea, China and Japan
Comparison Results of technical terms related to crisis management in Korea, China and Japan
Whistle blowing
Refuge Shelter
Public-Private Partnerships
Civil defense
Recovery
Blind spot
Vulnerable People in Disaster
Polarization
Public Rumor
Volunteer
Disaster
Natural Disaster
Conclusion
References
Introduction
Legal systems and technical terms pertaining to crisis management in Korea, China and Japan
Legal systems pertaining to crisis management in Korea, China and Japan
Crisis management related technical terms in Korea, China and Japan
Comparison Results of technical terms related to crisis management in Korea, China and Japan
Whistle blowing
Refuge Shelter
Public-Private Partnerships
Civil defense
Recovery
Blind spot
Vulnerable People in Disaster
Polarization
Public Rumor
Volunteer
Disaster
Natural Disaster
Conclusion
References
저자정보
참고문헌
자료제공 : 네이버학술정보