원문정보
초록
영어
This paper aims to make several suggestions. First, linguistic typology should be based on the correctly described data of the individual languages. Second, Korean linguistics also should be objectively described in terms of distribution so that it can contribute to the typology of languages of the world. We reexamined the so-called double subject constructions in order to check the justification of applying the concept 'non-nominative subject' to Korean. We concluded that the 'dative subject' is not true subject of the so-called double subject constructions, but just oblique constituent. The true subject of the so-called double subject constructions is realize in the form of 'NP1-eun/neun' or 'NP1-i/ga'. And we proved that the second constituent 'NP2-i/ga' in those constructions could be analyzed object complement, revealing the misconcept of 'predicate clause'.
목차
2. 언어유형론과 국어학의 문제점들
2.1. 비교 준거점의 문제
2.2. 한국어 어순 유형론의 문제
3. 한국어 타동성 유형론
3.1. 타동성 유형론의 전제 조건: 주어 정의의 문제
3.2. 비주격 주어 논의의 문제
3.3. 일본어 문장 구조에 대한 논의와 문법성 판단의 문제
3.4. 두 번째 '가형 성분'의 통사적 기능
4. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
