earticle

논문검색

Analyses for Two Different Types of Apposition

원문정보

Yoon-kyoung Joh

피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

초록

영어

Kim (2014) has previously addressed the semantic difference between the loose AC and the close AC by claiming that the former evokes a conventional implicature while the latter simply induces an at-issue meaning. However, in terms of the IQ test suggested by Bach (1999), the propositional meaning generated by the loose AC cannot be considered as a conventional implicature. Pointing out this problem, this paper addresses the difference between the two constructions in a new way, relying on the Generative Lexicon Theory advanced by Pustejovsky (1996). The loose AC projects two independent phrases as the anchor and the appositive. However, in the case of the close AC, the anchor and the appositive intrinsically depend on each other since one element is the overt realization of the argument of the Formal quale in the Qualia structure of the other element. This semantic characteristic of the close AC also results in its compounding-like syntactic nature. This proposal can explain four additional grammatical contrasts observed between the two constructions.

목차

I. Introduction
II. Differences between Close AC and Loose AC
III. Kim (2014)
IV. Proposal
4.1. Criticism
4.2. Loose AC vs. Close AC
4.3. Grammatical Differences between Close and Loose ACs
V. Conclusion
References
Abstract

저자정보

  • Yoon-kyoung Joh Associate Professor, Mokpo National University

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

    함께 이용한 논문

      0개의 논문이 장바구니에 담겼습니다.